If you have to explain your unique selling proposition, you don't have one. How to tell a positioning that actually works.
Almost every company we meet has a USP. Almost none has a positioning. The difference isn't semantic: a USP is a sentence written in an internal document, positioning is what stays in the head of someone who spent eleven seconds on you and then moved on.
There's an inelegant and very effective way to check whether a USP works. Ask three clients who know you well to describe what you do, without warning and without your website in front of them. If you get three different answers, the problem isn't their memory: it's that you never gave them a sentence simple enough to remember.
A positioning works when it gets repeated in your absence, in your words, by people with no interest in doing you a favour. Until then you have a claim, which is something you pay for. From then on you have an asset, which is something that pays.
First: the USP describes an advantage your competitor also has. "Quality, reliability, customer focus" isn't differentiation, it's the minimum threshold for being in business. A useful test: try writing the opposite. If no sane company would claim the reverse, you aren't saying anything.
Second: the USP is true but nobody cares. Many companies differentiate on a dimension the client doesn't use to decide. The classic case is technical excellence in a market that buys on response speed.
Third: the USP changes every six months. This is the most insidious, because it looks like dynamism. In fact it destroys the only thing that builds recognition — repetition. A mediocre message repeated for three years beats a brilliant one changed three times.
Start from where the decision happens, not from where you're good. Reconstruct the conversation your client is actually having when they choose: which two or three alternatives they're weighing, which risk they're trying to avoid, which sentence would make them say "this solves exactly my problem".
Then pick one thing. The temptation to add is the leading cause of death among positionings: every extra element splits attention, and attention doesn't add up, it divides.
Finally, test it in the field before putting it on the website. Use it in three real sales conversations and watch what happens: if the other person asks a follow-up question, it works. If they nod and change the subject, it doesn't.
A positioning isn't a statement. It's a testable prediction about how others will describe you.
NOTA works with a small number of founder-led clients over multi-year horizons. If you're considering a positioning programme, get in touch.
When producing costs nothing, producing stops being a service. What remains payable in corporate communication.
Read →ReputationThe reputational value curve isn't linear. Knowing where your company sits on it prevents you from stopping exactly when the work starts paying.
Read →Artificial intelligenceWhen people stop clicking results and read a generated answer, the question is no longer whether they find you. It's whether they cite you.
Read →